![]() |
| E. coli (A fecal coliform) |
Alright, I have
done nearly all the research I’m going to do, and here is a wrap up of the
fecal coliforms found in our local waters. I will save just a few specifics and formal graphing for
the presentation. I have been clarifying the differences between safe water and
safe seafood. This data ranges a bit, and the biggest difference is that the
FDA will classify the fecal coliforms as CFU’s per grams of food specimen. So it’s
different then the water quality which is in CFU’s per m/L.
| New Smyrna Site |
I found it
interesting that this was the case, but in research and the amount of samples
typically took, I have found that water samples can range significantly. In
fact they can range so much so, that mostly all the studies that I found in
water quality were based on monthly averages. However, there are desired levels of fecal coliform info that I have discovered.
| Control-Tuscawilla-New Smyrna |
As stated last
week, 800 CFU’s per 100m/L is considered to be unsafe for recreation use. Well
ideal environment conditions (on monthly average) is considered to be <200
CFU’s per sample. Daily given samples should be no more than 400 CFU Studies
indicate that individual tests can range greatly, so the main difference that I
would improve on for a possible future experiment would be to test maybe every
few days and take a monthly average. The individual test would be strongly
effected by rain, tide, and current or normal conditions of any given natural environment.
~CB


No comments:
Post a Comment