| Colorized scanning electron micro-graph of E. coli |
The search for bacteria continues. Where is it, how much is
there, and what kind of bacteria is beneficial or harmful to the environment. Two
examples are the ever-changing understanding of bacteria and its environment,
as well as the human environment in which it can found. Genetically modified
bacteria can effect a natural environment, and there are new experiments to try
to do this in a beneficial way. Nutrient-Control for GM Bacteria, is a recent
and current attempt to use GM bacteria to correct an environment in the positive
way. Genetically modified bacteria that don’t survive unless
given an unnatural amino acid could serve
as a new control measure to protect
wild organisms
and ecosystems against accidental release.
Genetic switches have made headlines recently, as
researchers engineer ways to prevent organisms built or modified in the lab
from escaping to the wild. Limiting the growth of a genetically modified (GM)
E. coli strain when the environment lacks unnatural, or no canonical, animal
acids (NCAAs). NCAAs have been used to expand or alter the genetic code of
various organisms. But by re-engineering the antibiotic resistance gene TEM-1
β-lactamase to only produce a protein. When provided with the necessary NCAA,
however, the E. coli can live for hundreds of generations.
| Human blood prepared on a slide |
So how much bacteria is on and in us? How important is this
bacteria, and what does that mean for the average person? Microbiologist Thomas
Luckey, who in 1972 estimated that the number of microbial cells in and on the
human body outnumbers those carrying the human genome by 10 to 1, was wrong:
people are not more microbe than human, scientists now suggest. “The numbers
are similar enough that each defecation event may flip the ratio to favor human
cells over bacteria,” “One-to-one is pretty impressive,” Judah Rosner, a
molecular biologist at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digest, “There’s
as much of them as there is of us.”
Of course, the new estimate could be off, the researchers noted, as it’s based on existing experimental data
that could inform an assessment of human and microbial cell counts, such as
estimates of bacteria in 1 gram of feces and data on the length of the human
colon. Moreover, the team only considered bacteria; virus, fungi, and other
microbes could push that ratio up. So with so much bacteria where does it all
go? and how might humans impact the local environment? All questions to
research in my project on the bacteria found in Canal Street Outlet. On to the experiment.
~CMB
Ellington, A. (2016, Jan). Nutrient-Control for GM
Bacteria. Retrieved from Scientist:
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/45130/title/Nutrient-Control-for-GM-Bacteria/
Luchey, T. (2016, Jan). Counting Cells. Retrieved
from Scientist:
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/45039/title/Counting-Cells/
Chris--are the GM bacteria something that would be found in the marine environment? If so--which kind and how did they get there?
ReplyDeleteI'm slightly concerned that your literature search deals more with human-focused bacteria and not on the bacteria we may encounter in the marine environment. Maybe all the references to humans/blood are confusing me(?).
DeleteI guess I went a little broad on the latest in the bacteria research. The article did have to do with a marine environment, but it was a projected new experiment. The blood, human difference was just the latest on bacteria in out bodies, which related to where our excess bacteria may be coming from.
ReplyDelete