Last week I was presented with a question from Caleb
on my Hot and Salty blog stating:
Hi Heather this is Caleb Douglas from OCE1001_02. Whenever I go
to the Beach I think it is a disgrace to see people throwing their cigarettes
on to the sand so that they can get washed up in the ocean and ruin the environment.
How much tobacco will it take to raise the ocean's salinity level?
Well to begin the introduction of tobacco into the
marine environment will not affect the salinity concentrations; HOWEVER, I will
be testing to see if the increased salinity will have an effect on the heavy
metals leaching out of the tobacco and filters of a cigarette butt. It has been
shown that increased acidity will increase the rate of heavy metal leaching,
ocean water is basic with a pH reading of around 8.2 where as fresh water is
about 7. This is due to the fact that salt is an alkaline and increases the pH
so there should be a correlation between increased salinity and increased pH
and hopefully a decrease in the heavy metal concentrations (fingers crossed). This
is important because with the increased CO2 in the atmosphere making the oceans
more acidic this could pose an issue of increased heavy metal contamination.
Amanda Sterns (sec. 51) asked:
I go to the beach a lot and can't stand the fact that smokers
are constantly using the beach sand as their ash tray. I would think that the
sand would really get far hotter than ocean surface water. Do you think the
heating of these hundreds (if not millions) of cigarette butts in the sand
combined with incoming tides, etc. would be an even bigger problem with leaching
of cadmium and arsenic? Whatever--just YUK!!!!
When an individual throws a cigarette butt onto the
top of the sand there is a higher risk of the butt being carried by the wind to
other locations (including the water) or the cigarette butt being picked up by
a bird when it confuses it as a food source. After talking with Dr. Bell about
this issue she confirmed my thought that that though the sand will heat up the
cigarette butts it will not reach a high enough temperature to release chemicals
that would be released by actually burning the cigarette. Cigarettes are made
so that they will remain stable in hot situations like leaving them in a hot
car all day, it’s the water that will actually break the cigarette apart since
at this moment cigarettes aren’t made to swim. When a cigarette butt becomes
wet the water will begin to break down the glue and paper holding the plastic
filter and the tobacco in place. This glue and tobacco begin to break down releasing
any of the chemicals that were used to treat and process them including heavy
metals and pesticides used on the tobacco plant, leaving behind the cellulose
acetate filter to further leach chemicals and cause a risk to organisms that
may consume it. So the cigarette butts in the sand does cause an issue when
animals or the wind carry them into the water, but the temperature of the sand isn’t
a pressing issue to a cigarette butt. What I am trying to test and what the
article in my blog “would you like some heavy metal with your aphrodisiac”
shows that the increase in water temperature speeds up this breaking down
process.
On my blog Would you like some heavy metal with
your aphrodisiac? I was asked the following
questions:
Tamika henry from class OCE1001_02
People eat oysters, if cadmium is toxic what effects will it
have on the human consumer after eating an oysters that's is effected with high
levels of cadmium.... how high the levels must be to negatively affect a person
and low the level must be to non-toxic?
Well unfortunately the test strips that I will be
using do not differentiate between what heavy metals are leaching into the
water but cadmium is one of them so I will get a general idea that heavy metals
including cadmium may be leaching into the water. As for the answer to your
question I’m not sure if you have ever heard of a disease called itai itai disease…
possibly not but it is actually a disease that happened from a cadmium
contamination in japan after cadmium was polluting the local Jinzu river from a
mining source. What happened was the cadmium started to bioaccumulate in the sediments
of the river then that water was used to irrigate the rice fields, where the
rice absorbed the heavy metals including cadmium. This water was also used for
washing, drinking water, fishing, etc. When the locals consumed the rice the
cadmium accumulated in their kidneys and bones. The cadmium replaces the calcium
in the body causing bones to become porous and brittle and causes kidney
failure. The Epa has a regulation on the amount of cadmium in drinking water
and food sources and it is set as “The Reference Dose (RfD) for
cadmium in drinking water is 0.0005 milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/d)
and the RfD
for dietary exposure to cadmium is 0.001 mg/kg/d.” As I stated cadmium isn’t released
from the body it builds up over time storing in the bones and kidneys until
levels reach such toxic levels that they cause death. This becomes a problem
for people who rely on the contaminated water as a main source of food and
drinking water
because they have a higher exposer to the cadmium than a person who eats
oysters every once and a while.
Tamika
also followed up with:
How does cadmium affect the marine animals that consume
contaminated (high levels of cadmium) oysters?
When cadmium enters the
marine environment it settles out into the sediments and is taken up by plants
and algae that are eaten by insects and then fish eat the insects and we eat
the fish… increasing the concentration in the food chain known as
biomagnification. The metal will accumulate in fish’s gills, liver, and kidneys
from eating contaminated food sources and “breathing” contaminated water. Cadmium
has been shown to cause high blood pressure, iron-poor blood, liver disease,
and nerve/ brain damage in animals that have consumed it. Cadmium also effects
the birth weight and skeleton development in animals. Fish with cadmium
poisoning will often have a poorly developed or crooked spine.
_________________________________________________________________________________
I'm not sure I agree with Dr. Bell's assessment of the sand/heat issue. If you've ever walked on the beach in the summertime you would easily see that the sand's temp is pretty darn hot!--far hotter than ocean surface waters. Much of the pore space in beach sands is filled with pore water. I would think that the heating of the sand (pure silica) would heat the pore water to a temperature that exceeds ocean surface water temps. If your original hypothesis that increasing ocean surface water temps might result in the leaching of more cadmium/arsenic holds true, I would think that the much hotter pore water would cause even more cadmium/arsenic to leach into the pore waters of the beach sands.
ReplyDelete..to continue--since much of the pore water returns to the ocean as ground water (as waves/tides move in), I would think that maybe beach cig butts might be a substantial source of your metals leaching into the ocean!
DeleteDon't forget to double check the word usage of "bioaccumulation", which occurs in organisms.
ReplyDeleteJason Vise sec.51 I think. I know your research is focused on metals. But are there any other chemicals in cigarette butts that might leach into the water and also be a problem for marine organisms? I know I've seen commercials or something about the tar. Could this also be a problem?
ReplyDelete